Origin and maintenance of large ribosomal RNA gene repeat size in mammals

Our latest paper is out as a Featured Article in the journal Genetics, featuring ONT from both the cane toad and BABS Genome snake genomes. This paper looks at how ribosomal RNA gene repeats (a.k.a. rDNA repeats) have evolved in vertebrates to expand in size in mammals. For something so fundamental to the function of an organism - literally every process of every cell ultimately relies on rRNA - there is surprising diversity. These regions are traditionally hard to assemble with short reads, and still provide challenges for long-read assemblies, so the new era of high-quality long-read assemblies is likely to reveal a lot about their evolution.

• Macdonald E, Whibley A, Waters PD, Patel H, Edwards RJ & Ganley ARD (2024): Origin and maintenance of large ribosomal RNA gene repeat size in mammals. Genetics 228(1): iyae121 [Genetics] [PubMed]

Abstract

The genes encoding ribosomal RNA are highly conserved across life and in almost all eukaryotes are present in large tandem repeat arrays called the rDNA. rDNA repeat unit size is conserved across most eukaryotes but has expanded dramatically in mammals, principally through the expansion of the intergenic spacer region that separates adjacent rRNA coding regions. Here, we used long-read sequence data from representatives of the major amniote lineages to determine where in amniote evolution rDNA unit size increased. We find that amniote rDNA unit sizes fall into two narrow size classes: “normal” (∼11–20 kb) in all amniotes except monotreme, marsupial, and eutherian mammals, which have “large” (∼35–45 kb) sizes. We confirm that increases in intergenic spacer length explain much of this mammalian size increase. However, in stark contrast to the uniformity of mammalian rDNA unit size, mammalian intergenic spacers differ greatly in sequence. These results suggest a large increase in intergenic spacer size occurred in a mammalian ancestor and has been maintained despite substantial sequence changes over the course of mammalian evolution. This points to a previously unrecognized constraint on the length of the intergenic spacer, a region that was thought to be largely neutral. We finish by speculating on possible causes of this constraint.